Year 4 / Primary Science / Physics foundations / States of matter
Changes of state: structured theory, worked examples, answered practice, and a mastery checklist for Year 4.
Unit
The essential chapter ideas in a clear sequence before practice.
Primary Science / Physics foundations
Link each topic to equations, units, data handling, and required practical thinking.
The structure follows the official textbook layout and is used to organise study.
The areas that usually create mistakes or need extra revision.
Choose the body or system, define a positive direction, and mark every force or motion quantity before writing an equation.
A free-body or motion diagram comes before the law. Use resultant force to connect interaction and acceleration.
Vector quantities depend on direction. Keep signs consistent and check that the final unit matches the requested quantity.
For “melting”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
For “freezing”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
For “evaporation”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
For “condensation”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
Primary Science / Physics foundations
Follow the method step by step and check why every step is valid.
In a safe test about “melting”, the first condition gives 14 units and the second 11. Which is greater, and what should be kept the same?
The first value is greater by 3 units. A fair test changes only one factor.
Explain “melting” in your own words and use a picture, objects, a table, or a simple measurement to support it.
A complete explanation connects the correct idea, a clear representation, and a sensible check.
Changes of state
Eight graded tasks from core fluency to exam-style application. Work independently before opening a hint or answer.
Record 9 safe observations about “melting” without writing a conclusion yet.
An observation is something seen, heard, or measured.
The response needs 9 specific observable or measurable statements, not guesses about cause.
Design a fair test for “freezing”: what changes, what is measured, and which 3 things stay the same?
Change one factor only.
Full response: one changed factor, one measurable outcome, and 3 controlled conditions.
Measurements are 8, 5, and 13 units. Put them in a table, find the greatest, and the difference from the least.
Use condition and measurement headings.
Greatest 13, least 5, difference 8 units.
Sort examples of “condensation” into two groups and state the sorting rule.
Each item should clearly match one group.
A full response gives two named groups, at least two examples in each, and an observable sorting rule.
Choose a suitable tool and unit to measure something connected with “melting”.
Decide whether you measure length, time, mass, temperature, or volume.
The quantity, instrument, and unit must match, e.g. time-stopwatch-s or length-ruler-cm.
From data 3, 9, 15, predict the next value and explain the pattern.
Look for the constant change +6.
21; +6.
Write 3 safety rules for a simple activity about “evaporation” and explain the risk each reduces.
Link each rule to a reason.
A full response gives 3 specific rules, each linked to a risk, and requires supervision where appropriate.
Data A=9 and B=14. Write a conclusion, evidence, and one limitation about “condensation”.
Do not claim more than the two values show.
B is 5 greater than A. The values support this, but two measurements alone do not prove a general rule.
Changes of state
Six distinct assignments from core fluency to challenge, each with an estimated time, hint, and answer guide.
Homework 1: Record 5 safe observations about “melting” without writing a conclusion yet.
An observation is something seen, heard, or measured.
The response needs 5 specific observable or measurable statements, not guesses about cause.
Homework 2: Design a fair test for “freezing”: what changes, what is measured, and which 4 things stay the same?
Change one factor only.
Full response: one changed factor, one measurable outcome, and 4 controlled conditions.
Homework 3: Measurements are 4, 6, and 10 units. Put them in a table, find the greatest, and the difference from the least.
Use condition and measurement headings.
Greatest 10, least 4, difference 6 units.
Homework 4: Sort examples of “condensation” into two groups and state the sorting rule.
Each item should clearly match one group.
A full response gives two named groups, at least two examples in each, and an observable sorting rule.
Homework 5: Choose a suitable tool and unit to measure something connected with “melting”.
Decide whether you measure length, time, mass, temperature, or volume.
The quantity, instrument, and unit must match, e.g. time-stopwatch-s or length-ruler-cm.
Homework 6: From data 6, 8, 10, predict the next value and explain the pattern.
Look for the constant change +2.
12; +2.
35 minutes / 30 marks
A timed, full-mark self-assessment with model-answer guidance.
Start the timer when ready, work without notes, show every step, and open model answers only after finishing.
1. Record 3 safe observations about “melting” without writing a conclusion yet.
2 marksThe response needs 3 specific observable or measurable statements, not guesses about cause.
2. Design a fair test for “freezing”: what changes, what is measured, and which 4 things stay the same?
3 marksFull response: one changed factor, one measurable outcome, and 4 controlled conditions.
3. Measurements are 9, 6, and 15 units. Put them in a table, find the greatest, and the difference from the least.
3 marksGreatest 15, least 6, difference 9 units.
4. Sort examples of “condensation” into two groups and state the sorting rule.
4 marksA full response gives two named groups, at least two examples in each, and an observable sorting rule.
5. Choose a suitable tool and unit to measure something connected with “melting”.
4 marksThe quantity, instrument, and unit must match, e.g. time-stopwatch-s or length-ruler-cm.
6. From data 4, 6, 8, predict the next value and explain the pattern.
4 marks10; +2.
7. Write 4 safety rules for a simple activity about “evaporation” and explain the risk each reduces.
5 marksA full response gives 4 specific rules, each linked to a risk, and requires supervision where appropriate.
8. Data A=3 and B=9. Write a conclusion, evidence, and one limitation about “condensation”.
5 marksB is 6 greater than A. The values support this, but two measurements alone do not prove a general rule.
Unit
Curriculum reference sources. Always confirm the teaching sequence with the school and tutor.
Where to start: textbook, daily material, PDFs, videos, and worked examples.
Targeted practice before full tests so coverage is clear.
How to measure progress in this chapter and when it enters a cumulative mock.
What to do after finishing the chapter and how it connects to the next unit.
Note: for the official examinable syllabus of each school year, always confirm with the school, tutor, and current Ministry/IEP announcements.
