Greek Primary Grade 2 / Primary Science / Physics foundations / Επιστημονικές ερωτήσεις
Παρατηρώ και προβλέπω: structured theory, worked examples, answered practice, and a mastery checklist for Greek Primary Grade 2.
Unit
The essential chapter ideas in a clear sequence before practice.
Primary Science / Physics foundations
Keep the link between concept, formula, units, and application clear before numerical practice.
The structure follows the official textbook layout and is used to organise study.
The areas that usually create mistakes or need extra revision.
Choose the body or system, define a positive direction, and mark every force or motion quantity before writing an equation.
A free-body or motion diagram comes before the law. Use resultant force to connect interaction and acceleration.
Vector quantities depend on direction. Keep signs consistent and check that the final unit matches the requested quantity.
For “σαφής ερώτηση”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
For “απλή πρόβλεψη”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
For “καταγραφή αποτελέσματος”, start from an observation or model, define quantities and units where relevant, and separate the changed factor from the measured outcome. Support the conclusion with data and state the test's limitations.
Primary Science / Physics foundations
Follow the method step by step and check why every step is valid.
In a safe test about “σαφής ερώτηση”, the first condition gives 12 units and the second 9. Which is greater, and what should be kept the same?
The first value is greater by 3 units. A fair test changes only one factor.
Explain “σαφής ερώτηση” in your own words and use a picture, objects, a table, or a simple measurement to support it.
A complete explanation connects the correct idea, a clear representation, and a sensible check.
Παρατηρώ και προβλέπω
Eight graded tasks from core fluency to exam-style application. Work independently before opening a hint or answer.
Record 7 safe observations about “σαφής ερώτηση” without writing a conclusion yet.
An observation is something seen, heard, or measured.
The response needs 7 specific observable or measurable statements, not guesses about cause.
Design a fair test for “απλή πρόβλεψη”: what changes, what is measured, and which 6 things stay the same?
Change one factor only.
Full response: one changed factor, one measurable outcome, and 6 controlled conditions.
Measurements are 6, 3, and 9 units. Put them in a table, find the greatest, and the difference from the least.
Use condition and measurement headings.
Greatest 9, least 3, difference 6 units.
Sort examples of “σαφής ερώτηση” into two groups and state the sorting rule.
Each item should clearly match one group.
A full response gives two named groups, at least two examples in each, and an observable sorting rule.
Choose a suitable tool and unit to measure something connected with “απλή πρόβλεψη”.
Decide whether you measure length, time, mass, temperature, or volume.
The quantity, instrument, and unit must match, e.g. time-stopwatch-s or length-ruler-cm.
From data 8, 12, 16, predict the next value and explain the pattern.
Look for the constant change +4.
20; +4.
Write 6 safety rules for a simple activity about “σαφής ερώτηση” and explain the risk each reduces.
Link each rule to a reason.
A full response gives 6 specific rules, each linked to a risk, and requires supervision where appropriate.
Data A=7 and B=10. Write a conclusion, evidence, and one limitation about “απλή πρόβλεψη”.
Do not claim more than the two values show.
B is 3 greater than A. The values support this, but two measurements alone do not prove a general rule.
Παρατηρώ και προβλέπω
Six distinct assignments from core fluency to challenge, each with an estimated time, hint, and answer guide.
Homework 1: Record 3 safe observations about “σαφής ερώτηση” without writing a conclusion yet.
An observation is something seen, heard, or measured.
The response needs 3 specific observable or measurable statements, not guesses about cause.
Homework 2: Design a fair test for “απλή πρόβλεψη”: what changes, what is measured, and which 2 things stay the same?
Change one factor only.
Full response: one changed factor, one measurable outcome, and 2 controlled conditions.
Homework 3: Measurements are 9, 4, and 13 units. Put them in a table, find the greatest, and the difference from the least.
Use condition and measurement headings.
Greatest 13, least 4, difference 9 units.
Homework 4: Sort examples of “σαφής ερώτηση” into two groups and state the sorting rule.
Each item should clearly match one group.
A full response gives two named groups, at least two examples in each, and an observable sorting rule.
Homework 5: Choose a suitable tool and unit to measure something connected with “απλή πρόβλεψη”.
Decide whether you measure length, time, mass, temperature, or volume.
The quantity, instrument, and unit must match, e.g. time-stopwatch-s or length-ruler-cm.
Homework 6: From data 4, 9, 14, predict the next value and explain the pattern.
Look for the constant change +5.
19; +5.
35 minutes / 30 marks
A timed, full-mark self-assessment with model-answer guidance.
Start the timer when ready, work without notes, show every step, and open model answers only after finishing.
1. Record 8 safe observations about “σαφής ερώτηση” without writing a conclusion yet.
2 marksThe response needs 8 specific observable or measurable statements, not guesses about cause.
2. Design a fair test for “απλή πρόβλεψη”: what changes, what is measured, and which 2 things stay the same?
3 marksFull response: one changed factor, one measurable outcome, and 2 controlled conditions.
3. Measurements are 7, 4, and 11 units. Put them in a table, find the greatest, and the difference from the least.
3 marksGreatest 11, least 4, difference 7 units.
4. Sort examples of “σαφής ερώτηση” into two groups and state the sorting rule.
4 marksA full response gives two named groups, at least two examples in each, and an observable sorting rule.
5. Choose a suitable tool and unit to measure something connected with “απλή πρόβλεψη”.
4 marksThe quantity, instrument, and unit must match, e.g. time-stopwatch-s or length-ruler-cm.
6. From data 9, 14, 19, predict the next value and explain the pattern.
4 marks24; +5.
7. Write 2 safety rules for a simple activity about “σαφής ερώτηση” and explain the risk each reduces.
5 marksA full response gives 2 specific rules, each linked to a risk, and requires supervision where appropriate.
8. Data A=8 and B=12. Write a conclusion, evidence, and one limitation about “απλή πρόβλεψη”.
5 marksB is 4 greater than A. The values support this, but two measurements alone do not prove a general rule.
Unit
Curriculum reference sources. Always confirm the teaching sequence with the school and tutor.
Where to start: textbook, daily material, PDFs, videos, and worked examples.
Targeted practice before full tests so coverage is clear.
How to measure progress in this chapter and when it enters a cumulative mock.
What to do after finishing the chapter and how it connects to the next unit.
Note: for the official examinable syllabus of each school year, always confirm with the school, tutor, and current Ministry/IEP announcements.
